TLAXCALA تلاكسكالا Τλαξκάλα Тлакскала la red internacional de traductores por la diversidad lingüística le réseau international des traducteurs pour la diversité linguistique the international network of translators for linguistic diversity الشبكة العالمية للمترجمين من اجل التنويع اللغوي das internationale Übersetzernetzwerk für sprachliche Vielfalt a rede internacional de tradutores pela diversidade linguística la rete internazionale di traduttori per la diversità linguistica la xarxa internacional dels traductors per a la diversitat lingüística översättarnas internationella nätverk för språklig mångfald شبکه بین المللی مترجمین خواهان حفظ تنوع گویش το διεθνής δίκτυο των μεταφραστών για τη γλωσσική ποικιλία международная сеть переводчиков языкового разнообразия Aẓeḍḍa n yemsuqqlen i lmend n uṭṭuqqet n yilsawen dilsel çeşitlilik için uluslararası çevirmen ağı

 09/07/2020 Tlaxcala, the international network of translators for linguistic diversity Tlaxcala's Manifesto  
EDITORIALS & OP-EDS / The unilateral award of the Nobel Peace Prize is an outright scandal
Date of publication at Tlaxcala: 07/10/2016
Original: L'attribution unilatérale du Prix Nobel de la Paix est un scandale pur et simple
Translations available: Español  Italiano  Deutsch 

The unilateral award of the Nobel Peace Prize is an outright scandal

Fausto Giudice Фаусто Джудиче فاوستو جيوديشي

Translated by  Jenny Bright


The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, and him alone, is a gesture to leave you open mouthed. You don't believe your ears and rub your eyes: so then, only one of the signatories of a peace agreement gets the credit for signing it? But what is the Norwegian committee thinking? Signing an agreement requires at least two parties and in Colombia, the two signatories were: Santos and FARC-EP.

So then, why don't FARC-EP also receive the prize? For the peace agreement in Vietnam, it was Kissinger and Le Duc Tho who received the prize in 1973 (the Vietnamese refused), for the Egyptian-Israeli agreement, it was Sadat and Begin in 1978, for the South African agreement, it was Mandela and De Klerk in 1993, for the Oslo Agreements, it was Arafat, Rabin and Peres in 1994.

If there was a man who deserved this award, it was Fidel Castro, for he is really the one who deserves the credit for the peace agreement in Colombia. It's Fidel who worked tirelessly in the shadows for a good twenty years, in order so that the Havana peace dialogues could finally take place. And the one with the least merit in this whole process is precisely Santos, who used these agreements for his own ignoble purposes: he counted on them to get re-elected in 2018 and to continue to hand over the wealth of a pacified Colombia to the pillaging multinationals and the Colombian oligarchy. And by requiring the holding of a referendum on the peace agreement, rather than the election of a constituent assembly to draft a new constitution, as requested by the FARC, he opened the door to his former boss, Alvaro Uribe, flag holder of the most aggressive and vindictive sector of the Colombian oligarchic right. The result of this referendum, as senseless as it was pointless: the peace agreement was rejected by "the people", in fact 12.5% ​​of Colombians.

Before receiving the Nobel Prize, Santos announced that the cease-fire would last until October 31. After having been nobelized, he changed his position, saying that the bilateral cease-fire would remain in force. But this would not be the first time a Nobel Peace Prize would make war: let us remember Shimon Peres and Obama.

santos-sodoma 2010

Courtesy of Tlaxcala
Publication date of original article: 07/10/2016
URL of this page :


Tags: Nobel Peace PrizeHavana Peace AgreementsSantosFARC-EPColombiaAbya Yala

Print this page
Print this page
Send this page
Send this page

 All Tlaxcala pages are protected under Copyleft.